Does your resume sound like AI wrote it?

A 0–100 measure of how much your resume bullets read as AI-generated. It uses the same scanner Oliros runs on every kit we generate: a curated list of 89 phrases recruiters cite as AI tells (results-driven, leveraged, spearheaded, cross-functional collaboration to drive strategic initiatives, etc.) plus a burstiness check on sentence rhythm. Higher score = reads more like you, less like AI.

Employers say AI-generated resumes without customization read as generic — and specific phrases, not AI use itself, are what gets a resume dismissed. Avoiding the phrases (without losing your voice) is the defensible move.

Nowhere. The scoring runs entirely in your browser using a pure JavaScript function. Your bullets are not uploaded, not logged, not stored. You can verify by opening DevTools → Network — zero requests fire when you score.

GPTZero and Originality.ai try to detect whether AI wrote your text using stylometric analysis (perplexity + burstiness). Those detectors are unreliable on non-native English — one peer-reviewed study found over 61% of TOEFL essays by non-native writers were wrongly flagged as AI-generated. The Oliros AI-Tell Score does not attempt that judgement at all: it counts specific phrases and shows you which ones, so you can decide. It cannot mistake your writing for a machine's, because it never guesses who wrote it.

Yes — that's what Surgical Tailoring does. We rewrite flagged bullets with minimum edits (preserving your verbs, rhythm, and specifics), inject your real JD keywords, and reject any output that re-trips the AI-Tell scanner. Free to start, three variants per bullet, 'use original' is always an option.